TOWN
& NEIGHBORHOOD NEWS
Mount Pleasant building permit
cap may be suspended By Kathleen Dayton
, Staff Writer, February, 2008
The home building fervor that pumped Mount Pleasant's growth rate
to almost 10% in 1999 and 2000 has turned down so sharply that town
officials are ready to lift a building permit cap they implemented
in 2001. But a building industry executive said it's too late and
the cap has already caused damage by artificially boosting housing
prices in the town.
The town's Planning and Development Committee
voted Monday 3-1 to suspend the cap until the growth rate, now at
1.2%, once again exceeds 3%. Only 344 permits were requested last
year in the town, which had limited the number of permits to 620 annually.
In contrast to the downturn, there were 1,731 residential building
permits issued in 1999 and 1,557 permits issued in 2000, the year
the permit allocation program was approved. So far this quarter, 38
permit applications have been received, Town Planner Kelly Cousino
said.
The decision to suspend the permit allocation
ordinance will go before Mount Pleasant Town Council Feb. 12 and will
have a second reading in March. "If that passes, it's official," Cousino
said. The town's growth rate will be monitored semiannually, she said.
As part of the permit allocation process, the town had also implemented
quarterly deadlines for permit applications. Builders now will have
more freedom to submit their applications without deadlines.
Philip Ford, executive vice president
of the Charleston Trident Homebuilders Association, said lifting the
permit allocation ordinance will not help home builders in the current
market. "Home building in that area is down," Ford said. "If you wanted
to build a house there, there are plenty of permits. By suspending
it now, it's really too late. It's nice that it's going away, but
it would be helpful if it went away for good. Permit
allocation has artificially inflated the price of houses over there."
The median price of a home sold in Mount
Pleasant in January was $375,000, compared with a median price of
$206,208 for a home sold last month in the tri-country area, the Charleston
Trident Association of Realtors reported . In 2001, the year the permit
allocation ordinance was implemented in Mount Pleasant, the median
price of a home there was $200,000, compared with a median price of
$147,000 for a home in the tri-county area.
Housing sales for 2007 Fourth
Highest on Record By Daily Journal Staff,
Jan. 2008
Tri-county home sales in 2007 fell short of 2006 numbers
and far short of record totals for 2005, but housing sales figures
for the year were still the fourth highest in history for the region.
There were 12,688 homes sold in the tri-county area in 2007, compared
with 14,240 homes sold in 2006 and 15,740 homes sold in 2005, the
Charleston Trident Association of Realtors reported.
Sales for 2007, however, were slightly
better than in 2004, when 12,639 homes were sold and better than in
2003 when the year ended with 10,778 homes sold. Only 8,812 were sold
in 2002. The median price of a home in the tri-country region rose
2.4% in 2007 to $210,000, and the average number of days on the market
was a little more than three months at 92 days.
Wil Riley, president of the Charleston
Trident Association of Realtors, said the organization’s research
shows that housing values in the area have risen about 6% annually
for the past 30 years. “That means home values double approximately
every 10 years, making real estate a good investment for the future,”
Riley said.
There were 713 homes sold in the tri-county
area in December, compared with 1,022 homes sold in December 2006.
The median sales price of a home in the tri-county area rose 4.8%
from December 2006 from $199,000 to $210,000. There were 213 homes
sold in Berkeley County in December with a median sales price of $169,000
and an average of 95 days on the market. In Charleston County, there
were 329 homes sold in December with a median sales price of $252,000
and an average of 124 days on the market. Dorchester County had 148
home sales in December at a median price of $202,420, spending an
average of 100 days on the market.
Mount Pleasant Approves
Taller Buildings Near the Bridge
By Molly Parker , Staff
Writer, Daily Journal, Jan. 2008
Parts of Mount Pleasant
could soon get a lot taller. Town Council voted Tuesday night to increase
the height limitation from 35 to 80 feet for new construction running
from the foot of the Arthur Ravenel Jr. Bridge to McGrath Darby Boulevard.
“We had no opposition
to it at all,” Town Administrator Mac Burdette said. “The land prices
what they are, the council is coming to the realization that there
are certain heavily traveled roadways where it makes sense to get
some height, where it’s necessary.” That doesn’t mean all of Mount
Pleasant is about to hit a growth spurt, he said, noting that when
“you start talking about height, people start getting pretty excited.”
Several Town Hall fights,
in fact, have been prompted by developers’ requests to waive the height
limitation. The idea to increase the height limits of buildings in
that limited area was prompted by a developer’s request to build a
new hotel/condo development adjacent to the Days Inn on Johnnie Dodds
Boulevard where a vacant building — once a restaurant and later a
church — now sits. Burdette declined to name the developer.
Some buildings in Mount
Pleasant already exceed the 35-foot limit, such as the East Cooper
Regional Medical Center and the Tides condo development overlooking
the Cooper River. But the town decided it made sense, Burdette said,
to allow the entire area to grow up — in height, that is, not girth
— while conducting the initial drafting of the Johnnie Dodds Boulevard
revitalization plan. “Eighty feet sounds like a tremendous elevation,
but ... if you put it in relation to that bridge, it doesn’t seem
so high at all. That bridge is so big that it puts everything on a
different scale,” he said.